Hot... especially if female looks on triumphant that male must submit, sayisfy her, carry and breast feed/nurture the babies. Role reversal with females in charge with males as domestics breeders, nurturers who must satisfy the dominat partner. Turn about justice and just better.
What is really interesting is the idea of compensation for breeding. Why? Because almost everywhere where women finally get the opportunity to do a lot more than be breeders and nurtures the fertility rate drops below or toward the replacement level of 2.1 babies per couple. The globes pioulation, if this continues will start to decline evdntually. What to do? As society prospers pay anyone who is good at it and wants to be a good breeder and nurturer enough to make it worthwhile without regard to gender. If avaiable today, I would apply now. Love
The point is that countries like Sweeden already provide compensation for delivering a baby. But it has not, apparently stopped or reversed the decline in fertility. Perhaps,t because the grant or stipend to defray the costs of a new baby are not enough. Professional women in the US have a much lower than replacement rate level of fertility. If we are serious about maintaining a healthy population maybe the financial incentive ought to be enough to be attractiveto them, like maybe $100,000 or more. The research to allow Men to carry transplanted fertilized eggs to term with c-sections followed by breast feeding (possible now)should be advanced so the max number of those who really want this as their life, whether, males and females who are willing to invest in children (probably a minority) can do so. Well, its sort of my fantasy with some reference to a possible scenario.
Hay lots of us would make that sacrifice. Nice CAP.
ReplyDeleteHot... especially if female looks on triumphant that male must submit, sayisfy her, carry and breast feed/nurture the babies. Role reversal with females in charge with males as domestics breeders, nurturers who must satisfy the dominat partner. Turn about justice and just better.
ReplyDeleteThis caption is perfect. It is sort of my dream scenario.
ReplyDeleteWhat is really interesting is the idea of compensation for breeding. Why? Because almost everywhere where women finally get the opportunity to do a lot more than be breeders and nurtures the fertility rate drops below or toward the replacement level of 2.1 babies per couple. The globes pioulation, if this continues will start to decline evdntually. What to do? As society prospers pay anyone who is good at it and wants to be a good breeder and nurturer enough to make it worthwhile without regard to gender. If avaiable today, I would apply now.
ReplyDeleteLove
The point is that countries like Sweeden already provide compensation for delivering a baby. But it has not, apparently stopped or reversed the decline in fertility. Perhaps,t because the grant or stipend to defray the costs of a new baby are not enough. Professional women in the US have a much lower than replacement rate level of fertility. If we are serious about maintaining a healthy population maybe the financial incentive ought to be enough to be attractiveto them, like maybe $100,000 or more. The research to allow Men to carry transplanted fertilized eggs to term with c-sections followed by breast feeding (possible now)should be advanced so the max number of those who really want this as their life, whether, males and females who are willing to invest in children (probably a minority) can do so. Well, its sort of my fantasy with some reference to a possible scenario.
ReplyDelete